• Home

  • Our Team

  • Services

  • References

  • News

  • Blog

  • Contact

  • More

    • Twitter Square
    • facebook-square
    • LinkedIn Black Square

    © 2015 by Thompson Education Consulting Group. Proudly created with Wix.com

    • Twitter Square
    • facebook-square
    • LinkedIn Black Square
    Clients & References
    Services
    Home
    Contact Us
    Blog
    News
    Our Team
    Privacy Policy & Disclaimer

    When Can a Texas Educator's Insubordination Amount to Soliciting a Romantic Relationship with a Student?

    January 2, 2019

    |

    David P. Thompson, Ph.D.

    Since the passage of Senate Bill 7 by the 85th Texas Legislature in 2017, the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) has been very busy writing administrative regulations (i.e., rules) to implement the provisions of SB 7 and to otherwise strengthen rules governing the discipline of Texas educators, particularly regarding inappropriate relationships between educators and students and/or minors.  SBEC adopted a very important rule revision on October 12, 2018, and the record of this adoption is found at 43 Tex.Reg. 6841. This rule expands the behaviors or factors that constitute “prima facie” (on its face) evidence of “solicitation of a romantic relationship” with a student, conduct which is prohibited by Standard 3.6 of the Texas Educators’ Code of Ethics. It truly takes 5-6 PowerPoint slides to elaborate this definition and these factors (found in 19 Tex. Admin. Code § 249.3), so the addition of a single line can easily get buried.

               

    The now-12th factor that SBEC may consider as “prima facie” evidence that a Texas educator has solicited a romantic relationship with a student is the educator’s violation “of written directives from school administrators regarding the educator’s behavior toward a student” (19 Tex. Admin. Code § 249.3 (51)(J)). In other words, in determining whether an educator may be disciplined for soliciting a romantic relationship with a student, SBEC may look toward whether an administrator previously issued one or more written directives regarding that educator’s allegedly improper behavior, and whether the educator disregarded the directive(s). If the educator did not follow the directive, SBEC may issue certificate sanctions if the educator cannot rebut that evidence.

     

    In responding to public comments opposing the addition of this factor, SBEC observed:

     

    The SBEC disagrees and maintains language as proposed.  First, it is important to recognize that the existence of a directive regarding an educator's behavior toward students is not sufficient under the rule to show prima facie evidence that an educator is unworthy to instruct or is soliciting a romantic relationship with a student.  Rather, it is the educator's subsequent violation of the written directive that the adopted amendment identifies as prima facie evidence of solicitation of a romantic relationship…An educator's violation of a directive regarding his or her behavior toward students shows that the educator received a warning and still could not stop the improper behavior.  The educator's violation of a directive shows that there was no accident, misunderstanding, or simple misinterpretation: an administrator told the educator that his or her behavior was wrong, and the educator still chose to persist in the same inappropriate behavior toward a student. An educator who cannot stop himself or herself from misbehavior with students is an educator who should not be allowed in a classroom. (43 Tex.Reg. 6841)

     

    This revision is extremely important for Texas educators to understand. As the number of Texas Education Agency (TEA) investigations into inappropriate relationships continues to increase, SBEC and TEA continue to look for ways to circumscribe the conduct of educators with students. Each Texas educator should be apprised of this rule revision in school district professional development initiatives. The stakes have never been higher.

     

     

    Tags:

    Texas Educators' Code of Ethics

    Educator Sexual Misconduct

    Please reload

    Featured Posts

    Since the passage of Senate Bill 7 by the 85th Texas Legislature in 2017, the State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) has been very busy writing...

    When Can a Texas Educator's Insubordination Amount to Soliciting a Romantic Relationship with a Student?

    January 2, 2019

    Mr. Chairman and members of the Texas Senate Education Committee: Thank you for the invitation and opportunity to testify before you today and for you...

    David's Texas Senate Education Committee Testimony 12/7/2015

    December 9, 2015

    In last week’s blog post, we visited a recent revision to the Texas educator discipline provisions found in Chapter 249 of the Texas Administrative Co...

    This Educator Insubordination Stuff is Pretty Serious, Isn’t It?

    January 10, 2019

    1/4
    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    This Educator Insubordination Stuff is Pretty Serious, Isn’t It?

    January 10, 2019

    When Can a Texas Educator's Insubordination Amount to Soliciting a Romantic Relationship with a Student?

    January 2, 2019

    Kountze ISD Cheerleaders’ Religiously-Themed “Run-through Banners” are Private Speech, School District Not Entitled to Governmental Immunity

    October 31, 2017

    David's Texas House Public Education Testimony 5/11/2016

    May 26, 2016

    When are Texas Government Officials' Personal Email Addresses Public Records?

    April 18, 2016

    Texas Supreme Court Reopens Cheerleader Banner Case

    March 11, 2016

    Former Texas Student’s Title IX and Section 1983 Sexual Abuse Lawsuits Dismissed for Untimely Filing

    December 17, 2015

    Fifth Circuit Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment to Texas School District in Race Bullying/Discrimination Claim

    December 17, 2015

    Superintendent Entitled to Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation Claim

    December 17, 2015

    David's Texas Senate Education Committee Testimony 12/7/2015

    December 9, 2015

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    Child abuse

    Due Process

    Educator Sexual Misconduct

    Educator sexual misconduct

    Equal Protection

    First Amendment

    Football

    Open records

    Public information

    Qualified immunity

    Race discrimination

    Religion

    Retaliation

    Social media

    Student off-campus speech

    Student speech

    Teacher Evaluation

    Texas Educators' Code of Ethics

    Title VI

    Value Added

    Please reload

    Follow Us
    • Facebook Classic
    • Twitter Classic
    • Google Classic
    To get started with Disqus head to the Settings panel.